Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorBoonpor, Jirapitcha
dc.contributor.authorParra‑Soto, Solange
dc.contributor.authorTalebi, Atefeh
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Ziyi
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Marin, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorPetermann-Rocha, Fanny
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Paul
dc.contributor.authorPell, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorSattar, Naveed
dc.contributor.authorGill, Jason M.R.
dc.contributor.authorGray, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorCelis-Morales, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorHo, Frederick
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T17:58:43Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T17:58:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5032
dc.description.abstractObjective The study aim was to investigate associations of 11 anthropometric measures with incident type 2 diabetes and compare their predictive performance. Methods This prospective cohort study included 161,127 White European UK Biobank participants who were free of diabetes at baseline. Anthropometric measures included height, weight, BMI, A Body Shape Index, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio (WHtR), hip circumference, visceral adiposity index, hip index, and anthropometric risk index. The associations were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. The differences in C-index were used to compare predictive performance between BMI and other anthropometric measures. Results The median follow-up was 10.0 (interquartile range: 9.3–10.8) years, during which 6315 participants developed type 2 diabetes. All markers except height and hip index were positively associated with incident type 2 diabetes. The strongest associations were found for WHtR (hazard ratio per 1-SD increment: 2.27 [95% CI 2.19–2.35] in women; 1.96 [95% CI 1.90–2.01] in men). Compared with BMI, WHtR and anthropometric risk index had significantly better type 2 diabetes risk discrimination. Conclusions Although most adiposity markers were associated with type 2 diabetes, the magnitude of the associations differed. WHtR had the strongest associations and predictive ability for type 2 diabetes and thus could be a more suitable marker for clinical use.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceObesity, 31(10), 2648-2657es_CL
dc.titleAssociations and predictive performance of 11 anthropometric measures with incident type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobankes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urionlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23849es_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1002/oby.23849es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile