Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorYáñez, Marco A
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorOvalle, Juan
dc.contributor.authorMagni, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Herrera, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T18:29:18Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T18:29:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5209
dc.description.abstractThere is an increasing interest in using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve hybrid poplar performance under water stress conditions. We assessed the growth and leaf-level physiological responses of different hybrid poplar clones to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and subjected to moderate water shortage. In a nursery experiment, growth, leaf gas exchange, and biomass partitioning traits were assessed during one growing season on twenty hybrid clones from interspecific crosses of Populus trichocarpa × P.deltoides and (P. trichocarpa × P. deltoides) × P. deltoides, which were submitted to two treatments of PGPM inoculation (Inoculated, Inoc_1 vs. non-inoculated, Inoc_0) and two irrigation treatments (full water vs. water restriction). The water restriction decreased shoot growth, photosynthetic rate (Asat), and stomatal conductance (gs); increased intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEint) of the hybrid clones but it did not change the root-to-shoot ratio. Unlike our expectations, by the end of the study, treatment Inoc_1 slightly decreased basal diameter (D) and height (H) relative to Inoc_0 (5.8% and 5.2 %, respectively). Moreover, seven clones significantly decreased the root biomass by 37% to 62% in the Inoc_1 relative to Inoc_0 treatment, while the other clones showed no response to the inoculation. Oppositely, while most of the clones showed no response to the Inoc_1 treatment on leaf-physiological traits compared to Inoc_0, some of them exhibited an increase of Asat of 15% to 39%. Overall, the consortium applied did not improve the responses to the water restriction, and responses to the inoculation were more associated with a deleterious than a growth-promoting effect, which is discussed in the context of nutrient immobilization, application method, and timing.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceIForest, 16(6), 352-360es_CL
dc.subjectBiomass Partitioninges_CL
dc.subjectLeaf-physiological Traitses_CL
dc.subjectPGPM Inoculationes_CL
dc.subjectPoplar Cloneses_CL
dc.subjectWater Stresses_CL
dc.titleVariations in the performance of hybrid poplars subjected to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and water restrictiones_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestaleses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.uriiforest.sisef.org/abstract/?id=ifor4378-016es_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.3832/ifor4378-016es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile