Ver publicación 

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Functional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorCossio-Bolaños, Marco
dc.contributor.authorVidal-Espinoza, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorVillar-Cifuentes, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCastelli Correia de Campos, F.
dc.contributor.authorSilva Ramos de Lázari, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorUrra-Albornoz, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorSulla-Torres, José
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Campos, Rossana
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T15:56:04Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T15:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5372
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The use of normative values and/or standards of functional fitness in adults is relevant to overall health and well-being. The objectives of the study were: to identify the physical tests of the senior fitness test (SFT) that have been applied since its proposal and to describe the proposed percentiles according to age, sex and country. Methods: A systematic review study was conducted in the Pubmed and Scopus databases. As eligibility criteria, we considered the period from 1999 to 2022 that presented data on SFT test used in the population over 60  years of age and that described normative values through percentiles. MeSH were used as: (1) Physical fitness, Exercise test, Senior Fitness Test, Functional fitness, Cardiorespiratory fitness, (2) older adult, aged, (3) Reference standards, standards, standards of care. Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” were included. Data extracted from the selected studies included: year of publication, country, sample age, sample size, sample sex, fitness component. Results and discussion: Seven studies were identified in five countries (03 in China, 01 in Poland, 01 in Portugal, 01 in Spain and 01 in United States). The age range ranged from 60 to 103  years. The studies were conducted in both sexes. The study with the smallest sample size was by Chung et al. (China) with 944 participants and the largest number of participants was the study by Rikli and Jones in the United States with 7,183 participants. In general, no study was able to complete 100% (8 components) of the tests proposed in the SFT. Normative values were presented through percentile distribution (p10, p50 and p90) organized by age ranges. Males presented better performance in FPF tests than females in all tests. Since the first publication of the SFT until 2022, seven articles have been published in countries such as United States, China (three regional studies), Poland, Portugal and Spain. No study has published the complete battery with its eight components. The percentiles of functional fitness reflect decline with advancing age.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Public Health, 12, 1335311es_CL
dc.subjectPercentileses_CL
dc.subjectSenior fitness testes_CL
dc.subjectFunctional fitnesses_CL
dc.subjectOlder adultses_CL
dc.subjectPhysical fitnesses_CL
dc.titleFunctional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic reviewes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Educaciónes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urifrontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335311/fulles_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335311es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile