Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
International survey on dry eye diagnosis by experts
| dc.contributor.author | Cartes, Cristian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Segovia, Christian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Calonge, Margarita | |
| dc.contributor.author | Figueiredo, Francisco C. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-06T20:41:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-06T20:41:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5570 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose To evaluate patterns and opinion from international experts with respect to dry eye disease (DED) diagnosis in clinical practice. Methods An online survey was distributed to worldwide DED experts. The use of diagnosis tests was evaluated including: symptoms questionnaires, functional tests, tear stability, tear volume, tear composition, surface damage and inflammation, and eyelid assessment. After the subjective importance of symptoms, tear break up time (TBUT), non-invasive TBUT, Schirmer's test, tear meniscus height, tear osmolarity, tear metalloproteinase 9, blepharitis assessment and non-contact meibography was evaluated according to likert scale. Results The survey was sent to 109 experts, and 77 completed the questionnaire (rate of response = 70.6%). Most of the participants were from North America (27%) and Europe (40%). A majority of respondents (73%) diagnose DED using clinical signs and symptoms, but not fulfilling a specific criteria. Seventy-six participants (98.7%) use symptoms questionnaires. All participants evaluate damage to ocular surface, and fluorescein staining is the most frequent method used (92%). Also, all the respondents perform meibomian gland and blepharitis assessment. On the other hand, only 69.8% evaluate tear composition, being osmolarity the most common test used (66.2%). Regarding to the importance of tests, TBUT (p = 0.002) and Schirmer's (p = 0.021) were found to be more important to experts from Europe than North America. No differences were found in any other test (p > 0.05). Conclusions This survey offers updated and day-to-day diagnostic clinical practice by DED worldwide experts. The results highlight the importance of symptoms and clinical signs, but not necessarily following a strict criteria. | es_CL |
| dc.language.iso | en | es_CL |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/ | * |
| dc.source | Heliyon, 9(6), e16995 | es_CL |
| dc.subject | Dry eye disease | es_CL |
| dc.subject | Diagnosis | es_CL |
| dc.subject | Symptoms questionnaires | es_CL |
| dc.subject | Expert survey | es_CL |
| dc.title | International survey on dry eye diagnosis by experts | es_CL |
| dc.type | Article | es_CL |
| dc.ucm.facultad | Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud | es_CL |
| dc.ucm.indexacion | Scopus | es_CL |
| dc.ucm.indexacion | Isi | es_CL |
| dc.ucm.uri | sciencedirect.ucm.elogim.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023042020 | es_CL |
| dc.ucm.doi | doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16995 | es_CL |
Ficheros en la publicación
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación. |
|||
Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile