Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorArmijo-Olivo, Susan
dc.contributor.authorFunabashi, Martha
dc.contributor.authorMiciak, Maxi
dc.contributor.authorDick, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorRashiq, Saifee
dc.contributor.authorMagee, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGross, Douglas P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-03T14:04:07Z
dc.date.available2017-11-03T14:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/1078
dc.description.abstractBackground: Physical therapy influences chronic pain by means of the specific ingredient of an intervention as well as contextual factors including the setting and therapeutic alliance (TA) between provider and patient. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of enhanced versus limited TA on pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) receiving either active or sham interferential current therapy (IFC). Design: An experimental controlled study with repeated measures was conducted. Participants were randomly divided into 4 groups: (1) AL (n=30), which included the application of active IFC combined with a limited TA; (2) SL (n=29), which received sham IFC combined with a limited TA; (3) AE (n=29), which received active IFC combined with an enhanced TA; and (4) SE (n=29), which received sham IFC combined with an enhanced TA. Methods: One hundred seventeen individuals with CLBP received a single session of active or sham IFC. Measurements included pain intensity as assessed with a numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) and muscle pain sensitivity as assessed via pressure pain threshold (PPT). Results: Mean differences on the PI-NRS were 1.83 cm (95% CI=14.3–20.3), 1.03 cm (95% CI=6.6–12.7), 3.13 cm (95% CI=27.2–33.3), and 2.22 cm (95% CI=18.9–25.0) for the AL, SL, AE, and SE groups, respectively. Mean differences on PPTs were 1.2 kg (95% CI=0.7–1.6), 0.3 kg (95% CI=0.2–0.8), 2.0 kg (95% CI=1.6–2.5), and 1.7 kg (95% CI=1.3–2.1), for the AL, SL, AE, and SE groups, respectively. Limitations: The study protocol aimed to test the immediate effect of the TA within a clinical laboratory setting. Conclusions: The context in which physical therapy interventions are offered has the potential to dramatically improve therapeutic effects. Enhanced TA combined with active IFC appears to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes when treating patients with CLBP.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourcePhysical Therapy, 94(4), 477–489es_CL
dc.subjectElectrotherapyes_CL
dc.subjectInjuries and conditions: low backes_CL
dc.subjectPatient/client-related instructiones_CL
dc.subjectPaines_CL
dc.subjectProfessional-patient relationses_CL
dc.subjectPsychosocial: otheres_CL
dc.titleEnhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: An experimental controlled studyes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130118es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

Thumbnail
Vista Previa No Disponible

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile