Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahlaoui, B.
dc.contributor.authorHachicha, M.
dc.contributor.authorRejeb, S.
dc.contributor.authorRejeb, M. N.
dc.contributor.authorHanchi, B.
dc.contributor.authorMisle-Acevedo, Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-09T15:16:14Z
dc.date.available2017-11-09T15:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/1152
dc.description.abstractThe response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to abiotic stress has been widely investigated. Recent physiological studies focus on the use of osmoprotectants to ameliorate stress damage, but experiments at a field level are scarce. Two tomato cultivars were used for an experiment with saline water (6.57 dS m−1) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) in a silty clay soil. Rio Grande is a salinity-tolerant cultivar, while Heinz-2274 is the salt-sensitive cultivar. Exogenous application of proline was done by foliar spray at two concentrations (10 and 20 mg L−1) during the flowering stage. Control plants were treated with saline water without proline. Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L−1) increased dry mass of different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) and it improved various chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters compared with controls. Regarding mineral nutrition, K+ and P were higher in different organs, while low accumulation of Na+ occurred. However, Mg2+ was very high in all tissues of Rio Grande at the higher concentration of proline applied. Thus, the foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L−1 increased the tolerance of both cultivars. The growth of aboveground biomass of Heinz-2274 was enhanced by 63.5%, while Rio Grande improved only by 38.9%.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourcePhotosynthetica,52(3), 421-429es_CL
dc.subjectChlorophyll fluorescencees_CL
dc.subjectFoliar pulverizationes_CL
dc.subjectProlinees_CL
dc.subjectSalt tolerancees_CL
dc.subjectSolanum lycopersicumes_CL
dc.subjectTunisiaes_CL
dc.titleResponse of two tomato cultivars to field-applied proline under irrigation with saline water: Growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and nutritional aspectses_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestaleses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urisibib2.ucm.cl:2048/login?url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11099-014-0053-6es_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1007/s11099-014-0053-6es_CL


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile