Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorArmijo-Olivo, Susan
dc.contributor.authorMagee, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGross, Douglas P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T15:17:02Z
dc.date.available2017-11-30T15:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/1507
dc.description.abstractObjective (1) To determine the effect of active and placebo interferential current on muscle pain sensitivity using an experimental mechanically induced pain model. (2) To evaluate the predictive role of expectations, gender, baseline muscle pain sensitivity, and intervention order on placebo response. Design Randomized placebo controlled cross-over trial. Setting University research laboratory. Participants Forty healthy volunteers (20 females, 20 males). Interventions Active interferential current, placebo (sham) interferential current, and no treatment/control were applied to the lumbar area on different days. Main outcomes measures Pressure pain thresholds and placebo response. Results The two-way ANOVA with repeated measures analysis determined a significant interaction between condition and time (P = 0.002). Pairwise comparisons found differences between active interferential and the control condition at 15 minutes into treatment (mean difference = 0.890 kg/cm2, 95% CI 0.023 to 1.757, P = 0.043) and at 30 minutes into treatment (mean difference = 0.910 kg/cm2, 95% CI 0.078 to 1.742, P = 0.028). The increase in pressure pain thresholds between the active interferential and the control condition (1.12 kg/cm2) was clinically meaningful. Logistic regression analysis showed that the condition sequence order was the only variable that predicted placebo response (odds ratio 9.7; P = 0.028). If a subject started the sequence receiving placebo treatment first, the odds of responding to placebo would be approximately 10 times higher (i.e. 90% probability of being a placebo responder) than that of starting with an active treatment. Conclusions Active interferential was more efficient than control condition in decreasing muscle pain sensitivity. Placebo interferential was not significantly different from control. Treatment sequence demonstrated a strong association with placebo response. These findings have implications for future research characterizing and identifying placebo responders in physiotherapy.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourcePhysiotherapy, 97(4), 291-301es_CL
dc.subjectInterferential currentes_CL
dc.subjectPlacebo effectes_CL
dc.subjectPlacebo predictorses_CL
dc.subjectMuscle pain sensitivityes_CL
dc.subjectClinical significancees_CL
dc.titleA preliminary investigation into the effects of active interferential current therapy and placebo on pressure pain sensitivity: A random crossover placebo controlled studyes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urisibib2.ucm.cl:2048/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940611000228es_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.01.001es_CL


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile