Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorArmijo-Olivo, Susan
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Contreras, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorMagee, David J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T15:17:10Z
dc.date.available2017-11-30T15:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/1508
dc.description.abstractStatistical significance has been used extensively to evaluate the results of research studies. Nevertheless, it offers only limited information to clinicians. The assessment of clinical relevance can facilitate the interpretation of the research results into clinical practice. The objective of this study was to explore different methods to evaluate the clinical relevance of the results using a cross-sectional study as an example comparing different neck outcomes between subjects with temporomandibular disorders and healthy controls. Subjects were compared for head and cervical posture, maximal cervical muscle strength, endurance of the cervical flexor and extensor muscles, and electromyographic activity of the cervical flexor muscles during the CranioCervical Flexion Test (CCFT). The evaluation of clinical relevance of the results was performed based on the effect size (ES), minimal important difference (MID), and clinical judgement. The results of this study show that it is possible to have statistical significance without having clinical relevance, to have both statistical significance and clinical relevance, to have clinical relevance without having statistical significance, or to have neither statistical significance nor clinical relevance. The evaluation of clinical relevance in clinical research is crucial to simplify the transfer of knowledge from research into practice. Clinical researchers should present the clinical relevance of their results.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceManual Therapy, 16(6), 563-572es_CL
dc.subjectClinical relevancees_CL
dc.subjectNeck outcomeses_CL
dc.subjectTemporomandibular disorderses_CL
dc.subjectMinimal important differencees_CL
dc.titleClinical relevance vs. statistical significance: Using neck outcomes in patients with temporomandibular disorders as an examplees_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urisibib2.ucm.cl:2048/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X11000798?via%3Dihubes_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1016/j.math.2011.05.006es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile