Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorRojas, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorPerelli, Simone
dc.contributor.authorIbanez, Maximiliano
dc.contributor.authorFormagnana, Mario
dc.contributor.authorOrmazabal, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorMonllau, Juan Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T18:25:23Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T18:25:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/3887
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is one of the most widely used procedures to restore anterolateral stability. Clinical outcomes after the addition of LET to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) have been widely investigated; however, the potential influence of LET on the ACL ligamentization process has not been examined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to use 10-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine whether the maturity of grafts after hamstring autograft ACLR was affected by concomitant LET. The hypothesis was that when modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (MLLET) was performed, the MRI parameters of ACL graft maturity would be modified. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included patients treated between December 2017 and December 2018 who had undergone anatomic 3-strand hamstring tendon autograft ACLR, with or without concomitant MLLET, and had undergone MRI 10 months postoperatively. Thus, the study included 30 patients who had isolated ACLR and 22 patients who had ACLR plus MLLET. The 2 groups were comparable based on all criteria analyzed. To evaluate graft maturity, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured in 3 regions of interest of the proximal, midsubstance, and distal ACL graft. Lower SNQ ratios indicate less water content and, theoretically, better maturity and healing of the graft. Results: The mean ± SD for SNQ was 4.62 ± 4.29 (range, 3.12-6.19) in the isolated ACLR group and 7.59 ± 4.68 (range, 4.38-8.04) in the ACLR plus MLLET group (P = .012). Upon comparing the mean values of the 3 portions between the 2 groups, we found a significant difference between the 2 groups for the proximal and middle portions (P = .007 and P = .049, respectively) but no difference in the distal portion (P = .369). Conclusion: At the 10-month follow-up, hamstring tendon autografts for anatomic ACLR with MLLET did not show the same MRI signal intensity compared with isolated hamstring anatomic ACLR.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(9), 2379-2386es_CL
dc.subjectACL reconstructiones_CL
dc.subjectLigamentizationes_CL
dc.subjectLateral extra-articular tenodesises_CL
dc.subjectGraft incorporationes_CL
dc.titleEffect of modified lemaire anterolateral extra-articular tenodesis on the magnetic resonance imaging maturity signal of anterior cruciate ligament hamstring graftes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urijournals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03635465211018858es_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1177/03635465211018858es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile