Ver publicación 

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Prevalence of dry eye disease in laser-assisted In situ keratomileusis candidates

dc.contributor.authorCartes, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorAravena, Camila
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSegovia C., Christian
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Cristobal
dc.contributor.authorQuidel, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorCid, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve, Rudy
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Luis
dc.contributor.authorAraya, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorAraneda, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorSepulveda, Maylyn
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-07T14:53:58Z
dc.date.available2024-08-07T14:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5582
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) candidates. Methods: A chart review of consecutive LASIK candidates who underwent full ocular surface work-up was performed, including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tests (noninvasive tear breakup time [ni-TBUT], tear meniscus height, lipid layer thickness, and meibography), and invasive tests (Schirmer test I, fluorescein TBUT, corneal staining, and meibomian gland [MG] expressibility). The prevalence of DED was calculated according to the Dry Eye Workshop II (DEWS II), and Japanese and Asia Dry Eye Society (JDES/ADES) criteria. Results: In total, 135 patients (270 eyes) were evaluated. The mean age was 32.6±8.3 years, and 62.9% were women (n=85); 19 patients (15.4%) wore contact lenses, and 31 patients (23.8%) used artificial tears. The mean OSDI was 18.2±16.9, which was abnormal in 54.1% (n=62). Inferior lid MG dropout was the sign with the highest percentage of abnormal results (61.5%; n=83). There were no differences between men and women in any test except for ni-TBUT (6.3±0.3 and 7.2±0.2, respectively; P=0.002). Dry eye disease prevalence was 25.9% and 53.3%, according to JDES/ADES and DEWS II criteria, respectively. The only significant risk factor for DED was artificial tear use for both DEWS II (odds ratio [OR]=3.5, confidence interval [CI] [1.35–9.39]) and JDES/ADES (OR=2.58, CI [1.03–6.48]). Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of DED and abnormalities in LASIK candidates and highlights the importance of ocular surface evaluation before photorefractive surgery.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceEye and Contact Lens, 50(7), 305-310es_CL
dc.titlePrevalence of dry eye disease in laser-assisted In situ keratomileusis candidateses_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urijournals.lww.com/claojournal/abstract/2024/07000/prevalence_of_dry_eye_disease_in_laser_assisted_in.4.aspxes_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001095es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile