How do you argue in physics class? a systematic review from 2018-2023
Author
Parra Zeltzer, Victor
Huincahue Arcos, Jaime
Abril Milan, Diana
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article examines the evolution of the teaching-learning process in science, focusing on argumentation as an essential component, especially in the field of physics. The growing interest in dialogic argumentation in the scientific community stands out, recognized for its ability to enhance learning and contribute to the social construction of knowledge. The relationship between argumentation skills, critical thinking and problem solving in science teaching is emphasized, using Toulmin's model as a framework to analyze the structure of an
argument. The concept of Sense Making is explored in the context of argumentation in physics teaching. The methodology includes a systematic review of the literature of the last five years using the PRISMA methodology, revealing consistency in the publication of articles on argumentation in physics teaching. The role of teacher educators as guides in constructivist activities is addressed, while preservice teachers play a central role in the
argumentative process.
Fuente
Proceedings of World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI, 2024, 263-268Identificador DOI
doi.org/10.54808/WMSCI2024.01.263Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: