Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorGómez-Campos, Rossana
dc.contributor.authorVidal-Espinoza, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorDe Arruda, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorVaz Ronque, Enio Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorUrra-Albornoz, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorMinango, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorAlvear Vásquez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorDe la Torre Choque, Christian
dc.contributor.authorCastelli Correia de Campos, F.
dc.contributor.authorSulla-Torres, José
dc.contributor.authorCossio-Bolaños, Marco Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:33:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/4540
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Measurement of hand grip strength (HGS) has been proposed as a key component of frailty and has also been suggested as a central biomarker of healthy aging and a powerful predictor of future morbidity and mortality. Objectives: (a) To determine whether a nonlinear relationship model could improve the prediction of handgrip strength (HGS) compared to the linear model and (b) to propose percentiles to evaluate HGS according to age and sex for a regional population of Chile from infancy to senescence. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was developed in a representative sample of the Maule region (Chile). The volunteers amounted to 5,376 participants (2,840 men and 2,536 women), with an age range from 6 to 80 years old. Weight, height, HGS (right and left hand) according to age and sex were evaluated. Percentiles were calculated using the LMS method [(L (Lambda; asymmetry), M (Mu; median), and S (Sigma; coe cient of variation)]. Results and discussion: There were no dierences in HGS from 6 to 11 years of age in both sexes; however, from 12 years of age onwards, males presented higher HGS values in both hands (p < 0.05). The linear regression between age with HGS showed values of R 2 = 0.07 in males and R 2 = 0.02 in females. While in the nonlinear model (cubic), the values were: R 2 = 0.50 to 0.51 in men and R 2 = 0.26 in women. The percentiles constructed by age and sex were: P5, P15, P50, P85, and P95 by age range and sex. This study demonstrated that there is a nonlinear relationship between chronological age with HGS from infancy to senescence. Furthermore, the proposed percentiles can serve as a guide to assess and monitor upper extremity muscle strength levels at all stages of life.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Public Health, 10, 1072684es_CL
dc.subjectDynamometees_CL
dc.subjectHand grip strengtes_CL
dc.subjectPercentilees_CL
dc.subjectInfances_CL
dc.subjectSenescencees_CL
dc.titleRelationship between age and handgrip strength: proposal of reference values from infancy to senescencees_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.facultadFacultad de Ciencias de la Educaciónes_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urifrontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072684/fulles_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072684es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile