Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Marín, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorParra‑Soto, Solange
dc.contributor.authorBonpoor, Jirapitcha
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorTalebi, Atefeh
dc.contributor.authorPetermann-Rocha, Fanny
dc.contributor.authorPell, Jill P.
dc.contributor.authorHo, Frederick
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Maturana, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorCelis-Morales, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Luque, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Recio, Guillermo
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T15:06:39Z
dc.date.available2024-06-17T15:06:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5445
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Understanding how socioeconomic markers interact could inform future policies aimed at increasing adherence to a healthy diet. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 437,860 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary intake was self-reported. Were used as measures socioeconomic education level, income and Townsend deprivation index. A healthy diet score was defined using current dietary recommendations for nine food items and one point was assigned for meeting the recommendation for each. Good adherence to a healthy diet was defined as the top 75th percentile, while poor adherence was defined as the lowest 25th percentile. Poisson regression was used to investigate adherence to dietary recommendations. Results: There were significant trends whereby diet scores tended to be less healthy as deprivation markers increased. The diet score trends were greater for education compared to area deprivation and income. Compared to participants with the highest level of education, those with the lowest education were found to be 48% less likely to adhere to a healthy diet (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.60–0.64). Additionally, participants with the lowest income level were 33% less likely to maintain a healthy diet (95% CI: 0.73–0.81), and those in the most deprived areas were 13% less likely (95% CI: 0.84–0.91). Discussion/conclussion: Among the three measured proxies of socioeconomic status – education, income, and area deprivation – low education emerged as the strongest factor associated with lower adherence to a healthy diet.es_CL
dc.language.isoenes_CL
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Nutrition, 11, 1349538es_CL
dc.subjectDietes_CL
dc.subjectSocioeconomic statuses_CL
dc.subjectEducationes_CL
dc.subjectIncomees_CL
dc.subjectDeprivationes_CL
dc.titleAdherence to dietary recommendations by socioeconomic status in the United Kingdom biobank cohort studyes_CL
dc.typeArticlees_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionScopuses_CL
dc.ucm.indexacionIsies_CL
dc.ucm.urifrontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1349538/fulles_CL
dc.ucm.doidoi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1349538es_CL


Ficheros en la publicación

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a esta publicación.

Esta publicación aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia de la publicación se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile